It’s Time Metro Marked the Frequent Service Network

I’m not sure whether it should be by route or stop location (since there are pairs of non-frequent routes that combine for frequent segments), but King County Metro needs to clearly, obviously, and visibly label the frequent service network. This has been a known issue for years, and many people have called for it, but it hasn’t been done. Other cities like Portland and Columbus already do it (by logo and route color, respectively), but people need the ability to passively┬ánotice where they can rely on a bus coming every 15 minutes or less, and where they can go on those routes. I’d love to gather a team of guerilla activists to go mark a set of bus stops, but I don’t know who would do it (the Transit Blog people if they were useful. Alas.). Plus Metro might have valid complaints about that. But increasingly it seems like we’re not being listened or responded to. I haven’t seen data (very curious to), but I’d bet that ridership goes up when you provide people this kind of increased and improved information–we know that happens in similar situations.

I don’t really care if frequent service is defined as every 15, 12, or 10 minutes, and the route schedules and maps should also be labeled on paper and online, but the critical thing is physical visibility at stops and on bus routes. This is for far more than just bus riders, to help encourage good transit-friendly location decisions. Even a new color of paint on the street where frequent routes go would be good. But frequent service is the core of what enables car-free life (not just work commutes or planned trips). It’s Metro that owns/maintains the stop flags, benches, and shelters.

There is so much critical work around here that needs to be done but which no one is funding. Just the kind of project I would undertake if I had a basic income.